A finding by the U.S. International Trade Commission that Samsung infringed Apple's patents would lead to less choice and higher prices for consumers, Samsung said Wednesday after an ITU judge issued a preliminary decision against the company.
Administrative Law Judge Thomas Pender issued a preliminary finding that Samsung infringed four of Apple's patents, one related to product design and three related to technology.
The infringing devices include models of Samsung's Transform, Acclaim, Indulge and Intercept smartphones, according to the judge. If the preliminary finding is upheld by the full commission, the devices could face an import ban in the U.S.
"If left to stand, this initial determination could lead to fewer choices, less innovation, and potentially higher prices for the American consumer," Samsung said in a statement. The company said it was confident the full commission will find in its favor.
Apple could not immediately be reached for comment.
Apple filed the complaint against Samsung last July, after Samsung had filed a similar complaint against Apple. Last month, in another preliminary decision, an ITC judge determined that Apple did not violate Samsung's patents.
It's part of a wider legal battle that's being played out in various courts worldwide. In each case, Apple says Samsung copied the design of its iPhone and iPad products, while Samsung says it merely mimicked them in a way that many electronics companies emulate successful products.
This summer, in a separate case, a California jury decided Samsung should pay Apple US$1.05 billion for infringing its patents. Samsung is appealing that decision.
The Apple patents at issue in this latest ITC decision are a design patent, number D618,678, and three technology patents, numbers 7,479,949, RE41,922 and 7,912,501.
The judge determined that Samsung did not infringe two other Apple patents, numbers D558,757 and 7,789,697.
See also:
Apple's 'overscroll bounce' patent tentatively declared invalid in the US
Report: Samsung Display terminates LCD contract with Apple
Apple Vs. Samsung: Apple loses UK appeal, must run pro-Samsung adverts
Contact Us
Digg
It's easy and free to get the latest news headlines, reviews and opinions straight to your email inbox. Sign up NOW to make sure you receive the latest Mac news, reviews and tutorials on your favourite topics.
Comments received
kevt said on Thu, 25 Oct 2012
Strange logic from Samsung. If they and partners Google developed products which were more different from Apple's then consumers would have more meaningful choice. A touchscreen mobile can be different - MS have shown this.
Disclaimer
Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Macworld. Macworld accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content.
Click here to read the house rules.
Click here for the latest reader comments