No more Boot Camp for Tiger?
Tue, 20 Nov 2007
So Leopard has shipped, but whatever happened to Boot Camp on earlier Macs - has Apple abandoned its community of beta testers?
It's a moot point, as in the months following the release of the Boot Camp beta news emerged that appeared to indicate Apple would make a final version of its virtualisation software available for users still running Mac OS X 10.4.
Such users will include slow adopters, those with systems that don't support Leopard, and a congregation of users who simply prefer the earlier OS.
Unfortunately, it also affects a wide community of Mac users with large installed bases of Macs, who will take time (and budget) to upgrade their whole infrastructure to Leopard.
But that last group of users seems likely to include those who have switched to Mac on the promise of Windows virtualisation, PC users who always eyed a Mac and moved to the platform on strength of the Boot Camp promise.
“Apple has no desire or plan to sell or support Windows, but many customers have expressed their interest to run Windows on Apple’s superior hardware now that we use Intel processors,” said Phil Schiller, Apple’s senior vice president of Worldwide Product Marketing in April 2006 when the beta software shipped. “We think Boot Camp makes the Mac even more appealing to Windows users considering making the switch,” he added.
Of course, VM Ware and Parallels both offer virtualisation products for Macs, so Boot Camp users can simply switch to that instead.
For many users though, the fate of Boot Camp on 10.4 remains an open question, as beyond the time-out of the beta Boot Camp software already installed, Apple has said nothing of the future of the virtualisation software on Mac OS X 10.4, leaving users to make decisions in ignorance.
While existing Windows installation on a user's Mac continue to work following the expiry of the Boot Camp beta, elements - such as the Boot Camp Assistant software used to install Windows in a partition on a Mac no longer function.
Boot Camp was downloaded thousands of times, and while Apple's clear strategy is to use the software as a Trojan Horse for Leopard sales, it's reticence in explaining future support for the older OS could be construed as further evidence of the company's determination to lead customers it once offered choices too.
Fair to say, when the software was released, Apple only promised: "The final version of Boot Camp will be available as a feature in the upcoming Mac OS X version 10.5 “Leopard.”
What stymied this promise were multiple reports, such as this one, which claimed Boot Camp would be made available to Tiger users for a fee.
Apple never made this promise, but the notion of these claims is by no means unreasonable.
So, Apple, what are your plans for Boot Camp on Mac OS X 10.4? Surely there's no viable reason (beyond the desire to boost Leopard sales) that Boot Camp can't be made available for users unready to leap to Leopard?
After all, as the iTunes experience teaches us all, trusting customers and giving them exactly what they want is the key path to business success.
Posted by: Jonny Evans
Email A Friend
Email this article to a friend or colleague:
PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.
Permalink This Article
This articles permalink is:
http://www.macworld.co.uk/blogs/index.cfm?entryid=295&blogid=8
<<newer entry
|
older entry>>
Comments received
ebernet
said on
wow....
SO disappointed by this article, in a reputable publication...
Since day 1 Apple made it VERY clear this was a Leopard feature, in beta, and will NEVER be available for Tiger. There was no ambiguity. Ever.
They made it VERY clear the beta would expire, and while your Boot Camp partition would continue to work, you would not be able to repartition again. This is NOT news, this was always the case. Since day 1. CLEARLY.
"news emerged that appeared to indicate Apple would make a final version of its virtualisation software available for users still running Mac OS X 10.4"
Really? Point me to it. No such "news" came out - people may have hoped, but citing a rumor site that does not even have a good track record as having heard from someone that maybe, does not apply. Plus Apple's solution is not "virtualisation" [sic British spelling] — it is a dual boot solution and a partition manager.
"... those with systems that don't support Leopard"
Um, please name ONE system th
ebernet
said on
continued....
that does support Boot Camp and does NOT support Leopard? Boot Camp needs Intel Macs, all Intel Macs are supported by Leopard.
"So, Apple, what are your plans for Boot Camp on Mac OS X 10.4? Surely there's no viable reason (beyond the desire to boost Leopard sales) that Boot Camp can't be made available for users unready to leap to Leopard?"
Um, the same as they always have been, since Boot Camp was introduced:
"More and more people are buying and loving Macs. To make this choice simply irresistible, Apple will include technology in the next major release of Mac OS X, Leopard, that lets you install and run the Windows XP operating system on your Mac. Called Boot Camp (for now), you can download a public beta today."
I see no ambiguity there...
Writing a blog asking Apple to reconsider support for Tiger is one thing. Having so many inaccuracies ("an open question", virtualisation) and claiming Apple somehow misled and is leaving people out in the cold is patently
ebernet
said on
unfair
JonnyEvans
said on
ebernet,
crumbs. That's a very party line approach to things, isn't it?
gregorsamsa
said on
When I upgrade to Leopard (not for a while yet) Boot Camp will certainly be a major factor. But considering Apple made no specific promises about Boot Camp's future on Tiger & the excellent price of Leopard, I don't think this is going to seriously disappoint too many Mac users or cause Apple any lasting damage. Though I think it'd be a positive gesture if they did make it available, I'd be surprised.
Disclaimer
Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Macworld. Macworld accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content.
Click here to read the house rules.