Fri, 08 Aug 2008 When Vista sales aren't Vista sales
When is a Vista sale not a Vista sale? Ask HP
Microsoft Vista is failing to gain interest from business customers, it appears, despite what official sales figures maintain.
According to HP, most of the PCs it sells are actually running Windows XP, even though the sales are reported as sales of Vista-enabled devices.
What's behind this unusual statistic?
Demand, HP explains: "From 30 June, we have no longer been able to ship a PC with a XP license," said Jane Bradburn, market development manager, commercial notebooks for HP Australia.
"However, what we have been able to do with Microsoft is ship PCs with a Vista Business licence but with XP pre-loaded. That is still the majority of business computers we are selling today."
Every sale of Vista is, in all actuality, a sale of XP.
Rob Kingston, group manager of commercial product marketing for HP explained: "Looking into the crystal ball, I don't think businesses will see much value in upgrading to Vista until late next year, and even so, Microsoft will probably have come out with something else by then."
HP's revelation casts doubt over Microsoft's claims about how many copies of Vista have been sold, as HP has made clear that although a sale may be counted as 'Vista', it may actually be XP, reports APC Magazine.
Email A Friend
Email this article to a friend or colleague:
PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.
Permalink This Article
This articles permalink is:
http://www.macworld.co.uk/business/news/index.cfm?newsid=22352
<<prev article | back to news index | next article>>
Do you share your creations online? % of Macworld readers agree with you What do you create and how do you share it? Follow the conversation at @TabletChat paintings & illustrations, mostly, which i upload to flickr.RT @fragmentedm I draw manga/anime characters. I also do graphic design and photography.RT @spialelo Yes. I usually put them up on my #deviantart account for feedback on how to improve.RT @spialeloQuestion of the day!
Latest News
- Apple intros Aperture 3, adds over 200 new features
- Walt Disney World iPhone update offers 300 pages, 500 photos
- VIP iPhone app drops from millionaire priced £279.99 to under a tenner
- Play.com: Google Nexus One now available for pre-order
- Amazon's Kindle gets ready to battle Apple's iPad
- Apple Store is down, new Macs imminent?
- Canon intros EOS 550D 18-megapixel DSLR camera
- WSJ: Apple could slash iPad prices if sales disappoint
- Apple offers 'find out how' tutorials as podcasts
- Adobe says sorry for 16-month-old Flash bug
- Getty launches subscription stock image service, Thinkstock
- RouteBuddy intros RouteBuddy Atlas 1.3 for iPhone, iPod touch

It's easy and free to get the latest news headlines, reviews and opinions straight to your email inbox. Sign up NOW to make sure you receive the latest Mac news, reviews and tutorials on your favourite topics.






Comments received
Russ said on Fri, 08 Aug 2008
What a shock! It just doesn't work!
Mathue said on Fri, 08 Aug 2008
Interesting. I was aware that this was happening but I wasn't aware of the sheer scale of it. Intriguing.
NB said on Fri, 08 Aug 2008
This is old news. Every corporate HP machine has come with XP since they introduced Vista.
It is not case of not working - it is a case that 90% of companies would need an massive desktop upgrade. If you had a company with 500 mac's on different hardware platforms and Apple says "here is Snow Leopard, some of your programs won't run on it and half your hardware won't work" of course you wouldn't buy it. Unless you were stupid.
Apple only have to build for their own hardware and still lots of programs didn't work when Leopard was released. No one said "It just doesn't work!"
Paul Meeks said on Fri, 08 Aug 2008
@NB
I don't agree. There were, and still are, plenty of people who insist on stating that everything Apple ever does is useless/incompatible/just doesn't work right. The simple fact that you seem to have missed here is that while Apple may eventually release an OS update that means some things won't be compatible - it happens to everyone at certain times of continued development - when you do finally come around to buying a new Mac you don't demand that the people you're buying it from either wipe it and replace it with an older version of the OS, or provide you with both so that you can downgrade later/choose simply not to upgrade.
Paul Meeks said on Fri, 08 Aug 2008
@NB (continued)
Apple may only build for their own hardware but, in my opinion, thats exactly why the Mac OS works so much better. Windows didn't work so well to start with - we all remember the far reaching incompatibilities of XP on launch and far beyond - but then they released Vista and managed to break it all the more! Its bloated, untrustworthy, incompatible and completely lacks almost everything that they, apparently, spent God alone knows how many years developing. Brilliant stuff...simply stunning!
NB said on Sat, 09 Aug 2008
I disagree. Mac OS is just as buggy and critical updates take a lot longer to get through. Love my mac but it is no better than my PC (on XP) - both crash and both companies claim to have invented the wheel every time they release another bloated OS.
WB said on Sat, 09 Aug 2008
@NB
I've worked with computers for over 20 years. All of the from DOS to Vista.
I purchased my first Mac in August 2007. I could not be happier than I am when I'm using my Mac.
I want to throw out all of my Windows hardware/software but, face it I can't do that being a computer support techician.
NB said on Sat, 09 Aug 2008
So have I, but Mac's still have (massive corporate & entertainment) limitations that mean that Windows wont go away. Like I said in my first post - when Apple release Snow Leopard and make lots of people upgrade and many bits of software stop working how many people will say "It just doesn't work!" because it is "bloated, untrustworthy, incompatible"?
James B said on Sat, 09 Aug 2008
@Paul Meeks
Windows does not lock in users to bloated prices. My Hackintosh works wonderful without the mental prices.
MMNW said on Sat, 09 Aug 2008
No news to me. I guess it's like that with other manufacturers. We get our computers from Dell. All our machines are Win XP. Though, I don't know how Dell counts the Licenses, cause we got some kind of a campus licence for XP. Usually the machines are not pre-installed and our in-house IT installs the OS.
I guess it's the same everywhere.
Zpok said on Mon, 11 Aug 2008
My last work place happily switched its macs to Leopard after 5 months, but will do another evaluation of Vista somewhere in 2009 earliest. All IT realities aside, this should tell you something. It sure did tell our IT department, who are more than ever looking for alternatives.
ZABAMAN said on Tue, 12 Aug 2008
You can't polish a turd.
Ken-not-the-Mayor said on Tue, 12 Aug 2008
I'm retired & live off flats. It took me half a minute to get a Mac tenant on-line to an Airport Extreme. Still struggling with the tenants with (ugh!) Vista. Nuff said.
Disclaimer
Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Macworld. Macworld accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content.
Click here to read the house rules.
Click here for the latest reader comments