Tue, 18 Aug 2009 Early Google phones running out of space for updates
May not be able to get future operating-system updates because it's nearly out of space
Users of the first Android phone, the G1, may be unable to get significant future operating-system updates because the phone's internal flash is nearly full.
A Google developer who works on Android said recently that he's unsure if the G1 will be able to handle further updates.
"As much as I'm hoping that it'll be possible to somehow continue updating the G1, I can't promise anything," Jean-Baptiste Queru, a software engineer at Google, wrote on Twitter. "We knew that internal flash space was going to be very tight on the G1 and we kept the system partition tight on purpose," he also wrote.
G1 users got the so-called Cupcake update to the operating system earlier this year. Google is reportedly working on further updates to the software, including a version known as Donut. It has not published information beyond the first-quarter update on the Android road map page.
T-Mobile denies that the G1 will be unable to accept future updates. "We plan to continue working with Google to introduce future software updates to the T-Mobile G1. Reports to the contrary are inaccurate," it said in a statement.
But some observers wonder if T-Mobile will continue offering certain updates, like security patches and bug fixes, but not more substantial updates.
The issue raises questions about application compatibility in the future. If developers build applications to the latest software version but the G1 doesn't have that software, the applications may not work for G1 users.
Queru declined to comment further for this story, and Google did not respond to a request for comment.
Check out our new Macworld Mobile site.
Follow Macworld UK on twitter: www.twitter.com/macworlduk
Email A Friend
Email this article to a friend or colleague:
PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.
Permalink This Article
This articles permalink is:
http://www.macworld.co.uk/digitallifestyle/news/index.cfm?RSS&NewsID=26915
<<prev article | back to news index | next article>>
Do you share your creations online? % of Macworld readers agree with you What do you create and how do you share it? Follow the conversation at @TabletChat paintings & illustrations, mostly, which i upload to flickr.RT @fragmentedm I draw manga/anime characters. I also do graphic design and photography.RT @spialelo Yes. I usually put them up on my #deviantart account for feedback on how to improve.RT @spialeloQuestion of the day!
Latest News
- Apple intros Aperture 3, adds over 200 new features
- Walt Disney World iPhone update offers 300 pages, 500 photos
- VIP iPhone app drops from millionaire priced £279.99 to under a tenner
- Play.com: Google Nexus One now available for pre-order
- Amazon's Kindle gets ready to battle Apple's iPad
- Apple Store is down, new Macs imminent?
- Canon intros EOS 550D 18-megapixel DSLR camera
- WSJ: Apple could slash iPad prices if sales disappoint
- Apple offers 'find out how' tutorials as podcasts
- Adobe says sorry for 16-month-old Flash bug
- Getty launches subscription stock image service, Thinkstock
- RouteBuddy intros RouteBuddy Atlas 1.3 for iPhone, iPod touch

It's easy and free to get the latest news headlines, reviews and opinions straight to your email inbox. Sign up NOW to make sure you receive the latest Mac news, reviews and tutorials on your favourite topics.






Comments received
David said on Tue, 18 Aug 2009
To be fair, this wouldn't be a big deal is it was a winmo/symbian phone, no phone in the industry is guaranteed updates except for the iPhone.
Daryn St. Pierre said on Tue, 18 Aug 2009
I have a G1 and I really hope this isn't the case. I don't understand why HTC didn't opt for apps and other data to be stored on the removable memory card. I know there are workarounds to make this the case but it should be standard. Now G1 owners are going to get stuck with a device they can no longer operate because the internal memory sucks (theoretically).
Daryn St. Pierre said on Tue, 18 Aug 2009
Meant to say 'can no longer update'.
Disclaimer
Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Macworld. Macworld accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content.
Click here to read the house rules.
Click here for the latest reader comments