Skip to main content

Digital Lifestyle > News

Tue, 25 Aug 2009 The opposite of Twitter: new site requires 1,400-character minimum

Woofer obviously isn't meant to challenge Twitter in the microblogging space

Jon Brodkin Network World

  • Email to a friend
  • Print this article
  • Bookmark this page
  • RSS feed

For anyone who complains that Twitter posts are too short to be meaningful, we present you with Twitter's exact opposite: Woofer.

While Twitter limits users to 140 characters per tweet, Woofer requires each post to have a minimum of 1,400 characters.

Question of the day!

Mark Hattersley
Editor in Chief

Do you share your creations online?

Question of the day!

Do you share your creations online?

% of Macworld readers agree with you

Yes
TBC
No
TBC

What do you create and how do you share it?

124 characters remaining

Follow the conversation at @TabletChat

paintings & illustrations, mostly, which i upload to flickr.RT @fragmentedm

I draw manga/anime characters. I also do graphic design and photography.RT @spialelo

Yes. I usually put them up on my #deviantart account for feedback on how to improve.RT @spialelo

Similar to Twitter, Woofer counts down the amount of characters you have inputted with a big number at the top right of the screen. But you're not allowed to post anything until you hit 1,400.

Woofer calls itself an homage to Twitter, but to avoid any legal problems makes sure to include statements such as "We are not affiliated in any way whatsoever with Twitter."

Woofer's user interface is near identical to Twitter, however. The service also urges users to tweet about Woofer and for a while Woofer was "borrowing" profile pictures from Twitter users.

Last week, I tried to post a gigantic "woof," by taking the text of a short article about Shaquille O'Neal and using the copy and paste function to get up to about 1.6 million characters.

Here's where it gets a little weird. Woofer asks you to type in your Twitter username. So I typed in my real one (JBrodkin) and my 1.6 million character woof appeared, along with my real profile picture from Twitter.

I immediately wondered: how and why did Woofer post my Twitter picture? I didn't type in any password. But I was signed into Twitter, so perhaps that's why it was able to grab my picture, I reasoned.

To test that theory, I submitted another woof but this time I typed in the username of a different Twitter user, one whom I have never met in person. That person's Twitter profile picture showed up next to the woof, effectively allowing me to impersonate this individual.

Woofer appears to be fixing this problem, though. As of Monday morning, most new posts are now accompanied by a picture of a little blue dog, rather than a real Twitter profile image.

Woofer does require at least some originality. At one point, I tried to woof by typing the letter "d" a bunch of times and then hitting copy and paste over and over again. My attempt failed and I received this message:
"No Woof. Really?! 1400 characters and you can only use d? You can do better than that..."

Woofer obviously isn't meant to challenge Twitter in the microblogging, or "macroblogging" space, to use Woofer's term. The parody Web site is run by Join the Company, a small company in Washington, D.C., which says it specializes in launching "entertaining websites that change the way people use the Internet."

For the most part, it appears "copy and paste" is the preferred method of Woofer users to reach 1,400 words. Some of the first woofs reached the minimum by reciting the opening paragraphs of the Catcher in the Rye, the Gettysburg Address and the Old Testament.

As of Monday, 1,623 users had posted 1,934 woofs - for a whopping total of 38,683,934 characters. If you're wondering, that's about 20,000 characters per woof.

Check out our new Macworld Mobile site.

Follow Macworld UK on twitter: www.twitter.com/macworlduk

Email A Friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:



PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.

<<prev article | back to news index | next article>>

Comments received


Badger said on Tue, 25 Aug 2009

Don't see the point - no one is going to read them, especially if most people are just copying and pasting from famous things. If you want to write more, get a personal blog.

Disclaimer
Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Macworld. Macworld accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content.
Click here to read the house rules.

Click here for the latest reader comments

Latest News


More news...