Skip to main content

Fri, 23 Oct 2009 Google placates India, China with different map versions

Chinese and Indian versions of Google Maps show disputed territory differently

John Ribeiro


  • Email to a friend
  • Print this article
  • Bookmark this page
  • RSS feed

Google has hit upon an interesting way of placating both China and India over the way its map application displays Arunachal Pradesh, a region whose ownership is disputed by the two countries.

The Chinese version of Google Maps shows parts of Arunachal Pradesh as inside China's borders. In contrast, the Indian version of Google Maps depicts the state as part of India.

But both of those depictions differ from the global version of Google Maps, which shows Arunachal Pradesh as disputed territory within broken lines on the map.

In August this year, Google Earth came in for sharp criticism in India for what Google subsequently described as a mistaken use of Chinese script to mark areas in Arunachal Pradesh, an eastern state administered by India.

Google products that have been localized to the local domains of a region depict that country's official position on the area, a Google spokeswoman said in an e-mailed statement. The Indian version of Google Maps represents the official position of the government of India, and other country-level domains may similarly depict the official positions of the country's government, she added.

As for the global version on the main Google Maps site, the spokeswoman said it was Google's standard practice to show all disputed regions around the world on its global properties. This does not endorse or affirm the position taken by any side, but merely provides complete information on the prevailing geopolitical situation to its users, she added.

The dispute between India and China over Arunachal Pradesh has heated up recently. China, which claims the state as part of southern Tibet, protested earlier this month after Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh went to Arunachal Pradesh to canvass for his party ahead of elections in the state.

Google Maps applies the same policy for its depiction of Jammu and Kashmir, a territory disputed by India and Pakistan. The global version of Google Maps shows Kashmir as disputed territory, while the Indian version shows Kashmir as part of India.

Check out our new Macworld Mobile site.

Follow Macworld UK on twitter: www.twitter.com/macworlduk

Email A Friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:



PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.

<<prev article | back to news index | next article>>

Question of the day!

Mark Hattersley
Editor in Chief

Do you use Adobe Photoshop with a Wacom tablet?

Question of the day!

Do you use Adobe Photoshop with a Wacom tablet?

% of Macworld readers agree with you

Yes
TBC
No
TBC

How does a Wacom tablet improve the Photoshop experience?

124 characters remaining

Follow the conversation at @TabletChat

Adobe+Wacom next best thing to drawing on real canvas with virtually unlimited tools at your disposal.RT @zaxero

yes, it's fantastic learning how to draw digitally, I used to use Illustrator more when i just used a mouse, now i love PS :)RT @mystra_inc

I'm loving the #intuos4 so far, its improving my #photoshop experience so far, but its my first tablet so no comparison.RT @zerohypeart

Comments received


jage said on Fri, 23 Oct 2009

I like this approach to solving world political crises - the BBC UK weather maps have a similar approach, showing Northern Ireland floating in the sea by itself unencumbered by the largely catholic south - I have actually annexed a large part of my neighbours back garden in the same fashion by drawing a dotted boundary on the back of a cigar box - sometimes I surprise him by popping my head over the fence whilst hollering ' get orrff moi land' and pelting his children with rutabagas!

Anthony said on Sat, 24 Oct 2009

Agree with Jage, this is idiotic.

Disclaimer
Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Macworld. Macworld accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content.
Click here to read the house rules.

Click here for the latest reader comments


Latest News


More news...