Skip to main content

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 Wikipedia edit system should be in place by year's end

'Flagged revisions' allows anonymous people to change some entries, but those edits must be vetted

Jeremy Kirk


  • Email to a friend
  • Print this article
  • Bookmark this page
  • RSS feed

The English-language Wikipedia should have a system in place by December to vet anonymous edits for certain high-profile entries, according to the online encyclopedia's founder.

The system, called "flagged revisions," would allow anonymous users to make changes to certain pages. However, the edits must be approved before going live, said Jimmy Wales on Tuesday. The system is already in place for the German version of Wikipedia.

Wikipedia, which is run by the nonprofit Wikimedia Foundation, said in January that it would test the flagged revisions system on the English pages. That followed a couple of notable incidents where the biographies of US senators Edward Kennedy and Robert Byrd had been wrongly changed to say both men had died.

Other Wikipedia entries have also been subject to frequent vandalism. In response, Wikipedia locked the entries and required those who wanted to edit to be logged in. New registrants had to wait four days before they could submit changes, which then had to be approved.

With flagged revisions, anonymous people can make edits, but they still have to be approved. Wales said Wikipedia doesn't want to alienate new users. "We hate cutting off those not logged-in people," Wales said in an interview.

Ideally, new edits will be swiftly reviewed, Wales said. In some cases in Germany, a revision may take just a few minutes to be reviewed, he said.

Although the system has been called more restrictive, Wales contends that's inaccurate. Flagged revisions will also "allow us to open up pages that have been locked for years," he said.

Check out our new Macworld Mobile site.

Follow Macworld UK on twitter: www.twitter.com/macworlduk

Email A Friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:



PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.

<<prev article | back to news index | next article>>

Comments received


IanR said on Wed, 28 Oct 2009

At last! I have long argued that there should be a 'quarantine' system in which edits by unregistered users should not go live until reviewed by an approved editor, to stop kids putting nonsense and profanity on the site, but of course Wikipedia always knew best...

Click here for the latest reader comments

Disclaimer
Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Macworld. Macworld accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content.
Click here to read the house rules.


Latest News


More news...