login || register

• Home
• News
• Blogs
• Reviews
• Masterclass
• Forums
• Subscribe
• Spotlights
• Shopping

• Latest news
• Latest Digital Lifestyle news
• Newsletters
• News widget
• RSS feeds
• Search news

Recently Macworld wrote about BlueBeat, a Web site that was not only selling MP3 downloads of The Beatless (something the Fab Four doesn’t yet allow, although you will be able to buy an apple-shaped USB drive with the remastered catalog soon), but also selling music in general for the cut-rate price of 25 cents or 15p a track.

Something seemed fishy.

A few days later, EMI—the record company that controls the Beatles’ music — and others filed a lawsuit against BlueBeat for copyright infringement and asked for a temporary restraining order (TRO).

And that’s where things get really weird.

As Ars Technica reports, Media Rights Technologies (MRT), the company behind BlueBeat, has a very reasonable explanation for why what it’s doing is legal.

You see, according to MRT’s co-founder and CEO Hank Risan, the songs BlueBeat is selling are in fact his original creations.

How’s that, you wonder? Apparently Risan told the RIAA’s general counsel Steven Marks that he authored the songs using “psycho-acoustic simulation” so they are new recordings and not subject to copyright restrictions. Well, that explains everything.

In its response in opposition to the TRO, BlueBeat’s lawyers claim that the Website is “entirely lawful and does not constitute piracy” and that the plaintiffs are not likely to succeed.

Also, the plaintiffs are well aware that the defendants “developed a series of entirely new and original sounds that it allows the general public to purchase” and that “copyright protection does not extend to the independant fixation of sounds other than those conatained in their copyrighted recordings.”

Uh huh.

Even if BlueBeat could somehow convince a judge that it’s completely legit—and that isn’t going to happen, mind you—there’s still the fact that the company doesn’t actually tell you that you’re not buying the originals.

The Abbey Road album page, for example, lists the artist, album title, track titles, record label, and release date—you would reasonably assume that’s what you’re buying. So at the very least, BlueBeat is misleading users into believing they are buying something that’s not actually for sale.

Oh yeah, and the Website’s FAQs say, “our mp3s are fully-licensed audio-visual works and BlueBeat.com pays all applicable royalties,” yet at the bottom of every page it reads, “All audio-visual works copyright BlueBeat.”

So which is it? BlueBeat pays royalties or it owns everything it sells? Seems like if its own Web site is so schizophrenic, there’s not much chance of convincing anyone else that it deserves to survive.

Check out our new Macworld Mobile site.

Follow Macworld UK on twitter: www.twitter.com/macworlduk

Email A Friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:

PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.

Permalink This Article

This articles permalink is:
http://www.macworld.co.uk/digitallifestyle/news/index.cfm?RSS&NewsID=27654

Disclaimer
Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Macworld. Macworld accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content.
Click here to read the house rules.

Click here for the latest reader comments

Mac Broadband?

Compare 20+ Mac
mobile broadband packages
or enter your postcode below:

Postcode Powered by