Skip to main content

Digital Lifestyle > News

Tue, 28 Oct 2008 Researcher warns of critical Google bug in G1 phone

Security researcher finds flaw in Google G1 phone

Gregg Keizer, Computerworld

  • Email to a friend
  • Print this article
  • Bookmark this page
  • RSS feed

A noted security researcher Monday warned users of T-Mobile's G1 smart phone that a critical vulnerability in Google's Android operating system could be used to hack their phones.

Led by Charlie Miller , a researcher who has rooted out high-profile bugs in Apple Inc. 's Mac OS X and iPhone , a team from Independent Security Evaluators (ISE) identified the bug and reported it to Google last week. ISE is a Baltimore-based security consultancy where Miller works.

Question of the day!

Mark Hattersley
Editor in Chief

Do you share your creations online?

Question of the day!

Do you share your creations online?

% of Macworld readers agree with you

Yes
TBC
No
TBC

What do you create and how do you share it?

124 characters remaining

Follow the conversation at @TabletChat

paintings & illustrations, mostly, which i upload to flickr.RT @fragmentedm

I draw manga/anime characters. I also do graphic design and photography.RT @spialelo

Yes. I usually put them up on my #deviantart account for feedback on how to improve.RT @spialelo

Miller, who declined to get specific about the vulnerability, said only that it is a buffer overflow bug that could be exploited by tricking G1 users into visiting malicious sites. "There's a chance that the attacker could execute malicious code remotely" with the same privileges as the user of the phone's browser, Miller said.

T-Mobile started shipping the G1 shortly before the 22 October launch date ; the phone is the first powered by Google's open-source mobile phone operating system, Android.

Miller said that after alerting Google, a security researcher from its Android team contacted him for more information, and to ask that he withhold information until a patch was in place. Miller refused to wait, but promised not to disclose any details or technical information that could be used by hackers.

"People should know that there's a problem with the G1 before they buy it," Miller said as he defended his actions. "I don't want to help the bad guys either, but people should have all the information before they make a decision to buy [the phone]. I think I'm totally in the right here."

Google did not respond to a request for comment, or to questions about the status of any patch for Android and the G1.

Miller also said that he and others at ISE had crafted a working exploit, but would not release it until a patch is in hand.

According to a more detailed warning on the ISE site, the flaw is within one of the more than 80 different open-source packages used by Google to assemble Android. Miller blamed the bug on Google's use of outdated code. "This particular security vulnerability that affects the G1 phone was known and fixed in the relevant software package, but Google used an older, still vulnerable version," said the ISE alert.

Miller declined to name the specific open-source package at fault.

Google has been caught in the same bind before. Because it used an older version of WebKit , the open-source rendering engine that also powers Apple's Safari, for the foundation of its own Chrome browser, users were at risk from attacks based on a months-old flaw that had been dubbed the "carpet bomb" bug.

Google patched the carpet bomb vulnerability in a development build of Chrome two weeks ago. Miller is well known in the Mac and iPhone vulnerability research community, and was on the same three-man ISC team that spotted and reported the first bug in Apple's iPhone shortly after it launched in mid-2007. Several months before that, he walked off with a $10,000 prize in an inaugural hacking contest by cracking an Apple laptop running Mac OS X in less than two minutes.

"I like the iPhone," said Miller, "but the G1 actually has a lot better security. In Android, Google uses this compartmentalized security architecture, application sandboxing really, so that each app runs as its own user and can access only its own files. So even though I can exploit the browser, I can't read the person's e-mail."

But even though it boasts stronger security, the G1 is still dangerous, Miller said, blaming user naivete.

"People are trained to be careful when they're browsing from the desktop or laptop, but hand them a phone and all the rules seems to go out the window," Miller said. "They use [their smart phone] to do everything they do on the desktop, but they forget they can get into trouble browsing from their phone."

Email A Friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:



PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.

<<prev article | back to news index | next article>>

Comments received


MrEd said on Tue, 28 Oct 2008

""I like the iPhone," said Miller, "but the G1 actually has a lot better security."

"the G1 is still dangerous"

Your reporting is sensationalist crap. Your comments would make the iPhone worse than dangerous!!

Disclaimer
Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Macworld. Macworld accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content.
Click here to read the house rules.

Click here for the latest reader comments

Latest News


More news...