Further evidence that Apple is planning to launch a 7.85in version of the iPad has emerged from sources in the company's supply chain.
Digitimes reports that these anonymous sources now believe that Apple will choose to use a slim bezel in what some are calling the 'iPad mini' in order to maximise the viewing area of the tablet.
The sources claim that the new, smaller model may not have a Retina display like the new iPad, but will use IPS/FFS (in-plane switching/fringe-field switching) panels manufactured by LG Display and AU Optronics.
Earlier rumours named these two companies as suppliers of displays for the smaller iPad. The price of such a device is likely to be in the $249 - $299 (around £126 to £158) range, the Digitimes report claims.

Samsung's investment bank arm Samsung Securities has also touted the likelihood of Apple launching a smaller tablet device perhaps in the third quarter of 2012.
Other reports suggesting that prototypes of the device are in testing with production to begin in the second quarter of 2012 have been circulating in recent months.


It's easy and free to get the latest news headlines, reviews and opinions straight to your email inbox. Sign up NOW to make sure you receive the latest Mac news, reviews and tutorials on your favourite topics.






Comments received
Dragonfly said on Mon, 12 Mar 2012
Some thoughts:-
• If Apple decided to make a 7.85" iPad, it wouldn't be so they can sell it cheap, it'll be because there's a possible market for a 7.85" iPad. There won't be a £126 iPad !!! :-D
• It will need to be the same resolution as either the iPad2 or iPad3 otherwise more versions of Apps will need to be made / compiled / sold.
• 1024x768 (iPad2) on a 7.85" screen would be 163 PPI (I can't see them wanting to associate a new iPad with anything less than a Retina display !!!
• 2048 x 1536 on a 7.85" screen comes out at 326 PPI, which just happens to be the same as the iPhone 4/4S PPI :-)
• "slim bezel" The bezel needs to have enough space around the screen to allow the device to be held without obscuring or touching the screen.
Disclaimer
Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Macworld. Macworld accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content.
Click here to read the house rules.
Click here for the latest reader comments