Apple may use oxide-based LCD screens for a next generation iPad 5 with a "stunning" screen that is thinner and more power efficient.
LG is about to make a massive investment in the new technology and it's commitment to this oxide-based LCD manufacturing "points to rising orders from top device makers like Apple," notes a Korea Times report.
Oxide LCDs are thinner and more power efficient than current LCDs. According to the report, OLED screens also offer a "stunning upgrade in picture quality" compared to conventional LCDs.
If you are thinking you had heard about OLED screens before you probably have, but due the high costs and difficulty in mass production the adoption of the technology has been slow. However Samsung, LG and Sony all believe they will see a breakthrough on this front this year, according to the report.
Industry observers believe there is a possibility that Apple will apply these screens on its next version of the iPad, notes Patently Apple.
LG Display is to spend 3.8 trillion won ($3.6 billion, £2.3 billion) on new facilities for the production of the new displays. The company also plans to mass-produce bendable displays for use in mobile devices this year, according to the report.
Follow Karen Haslam on Twitter / Follow MacworldUK on Twitter
Related:
New iPad 5 release date, rumours and leaked images
Samsung previews foldable, rollable 'Youm' smartphone displays
iPhone 5 rumours - tactile touch screen, Liquidmetal body, front-facing HD camera
New iPhone to have flexible display - report
Contact Us
Digg
It's easy and free to get the latest news headlines, reviews and opinions straight to your email inbox. Sign up NOW to make sure you receive the latest Mac news, reviews and tutorials on your favourite topics.
Comments received
Aryugaetu said on Wed, 23 Jan 2013
Thinner - hi-res screen - faster CPU - YAAAAWN!
… as Apple quietly slides down into the vast pool of unimaginative companies, squeezing every penny out of the ignorant public, followed downward by their stock.
Disclaimer
Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Macworld. Macworld accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content.
Click here to read the house rules.
Click here for the latest reader comments