Apple's OS X Snow Leopard, which shipped in August 2009, continued to resist retirement last month, new data showed.
January statistics from Web analytics vendor Net Applications pegged Snow Leopard's share of all Macs at 28.2%, half a point higher than the 27.7% recorded by OS X Lion.
It was the fourth month in a row that Snow Leopard has been in second place, behind the newest edition, OS X Mountain Lion, but ahead of 2011's Lion.
The numbers illustrate the persistence of Snow Leopard, which has gained a reputation as Apple's version of Microsoft's Windows XP, an OS that stubbornly sticks around.
Meanwhile, Mountain Lion, which Apple shipped in July 2012, again gained ground last month at the expense of its predecessors, ending January in the No. 1 position with 34.5% of all Macs.
Approximately 7% of Mac owners ran 2009's OS X Leopard in January.
Mountain Lion will not remain at the top for long. Apple has committed to an annual operating system upgrade cycle, meaning that OS X 10.9 -- which has not yet been tagged with a feline moniker -- will likely launch this summer.
Unlike Microsoft, Apple has consistently convinced a significant portion of its customers to quickly upgrade to the newest operating system. Unless that pattern changes, by this time next year OS X 10.9 will be the most-used edition.
Snow Leopard users, however, have been more reluctant to upgrade than those running Lion, and the accumulating data hints at a longer-than-usual life for OS X 10.6.
Many have declared that they would not abandon Snow Leopard because it was the last that let users run applications compiled for the PowerPC processor. Although Rosetta, the translation utility that allows PowerPC software to run on Intel-based Macs, is not installed by default on OS X 10.6, it does automatically install the first time a PowerPC program executes. Neither Lion or Mountain Lion support Rosetta, and so are unable to run PowerPC applications.
But Snow Leopard users face a new security challenge this year: Oracle has just provided the final update for Java 6, and without Oracle's help, Apple will undoubtedly also halt its Java security work.
Java 6's successor, Java 7, runs only on Lion and Mountain Lion. That, along with the end of support, means Snow Leopard and Leopard are now out in the cold.
Net Applications measures operating system usage by tracking unique visitors to approximately 40,000 websites. More information about its January stats -- including problems Microsoft's Windows 8 has had growing its share -- can be found on the company's site.
Snow Leopard bolstered its reputation as the Windows XP of the Mac with the fourth straight month of out-dueling OS X Lion. (Data: Net Applications.)
Gregg Keizer covers Microsoft, security issues, Apple, Web browsers and general technology breaking news for Computerworld. Follow Gregg on Twitter at @gkeizer, on Google+ or subscribe to Gregg's RSS feed. His email address is gkeizer@computerworld.com.
See more by Gregg Keizer on Computerworld.com.
Read more about mac os x in Computerworld's Mac OS X Topic Center.
See also:
iMac delays extend to 6 weeks as Apple continues to face supply issues
Siri on the Mac: Apple recruiting developer to bring Siri to the Mac
Gartner: Apple OS X will be as accepted as Windows by the end of 2014
Contact Us
Digg
It's easy and free to get the latest news headlines, reviews and opinions straight to your email inbox. Sign up NOW to make sure you receive the latest Mac news, reviews and tutorials on your favourite topics.
Comments received
NeilFiertel said on Thu, 07 Feb 2013
I tried to switch to later OSs from Snow Leopard and my tracking device Kensington expert mouse and my Microsoft keyboard would no longer work together. the upgrades for both use the very same underlying code and made the upgrade impossible. Snow leopard is great and stable. who cares? I got rid of java. Apple screwed us up by making older hardware drivers incompatible
Dragonfly said on Thu, 07 Feb 2013
The last version that was available on a DVD Rom (and doesn't require a massive download) I bet has something to do with it. Also the fact Macs aren't good with backward compatibility of older software, which would require everyone to update their software again. Didn't they remove rosetta in 10.7 ?
Compatibility layers that allows the OS to mimic 10.6, 10.7 if required would be a good compromise. I don't know how easy or difficult that would be to add on. Apple's concept that everyone is a millionaire and should update all their software every 18 months (just to benefit from features like an integrated desktop Twitter client) is just not the reality.
It's certainly not the price that's putting people off.
terryjb45 said on Thu, 07 Feb 2013
It just works, which is why I will need to be strong armed into changing. It has everything I need and some people I have spoken to who have upgraded have had real problems with compatibility with their current software. I suspect that we will eventually be forced to upgrade when Apple and Adobe stop supporting it.
Disclaimer
Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Macworld. Macworld accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content.
Click here to read the house rules.
Click here for the latest reader comments