Thu, 27 Aug 2009 Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard benchmarks
Macworld Lab tests Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard to see how much faster it truly makes your Mac run
Apple describes Snow Leopard as a top-to-bottom refinement of existing features. One major goal of those refinements: Improved performance.
Snow Leopard aims to run leaner and faster on current and recent Macs, in part by dropping support for legacy Power PC systems and focusing solely on Intel-powered Macs. And while some of Snow Leopard’s potential performance gains won’t show up until software developers optimize their applications for the new OS, others are apparent right now.
Question of the day!
Do you share your creations online?
% of Macworld readers agree with you
What do you create and how do you share it?
Follow the conversation at @TabletChat
paintings & illustrations, mostly, which i upload to flickr.RT @fragmentedm
I draw manga/anime characters. I also do graphic design and photography.RT @spialelo
Yes. I usually put them up on my #deviantart account for feedback on how to improve.RT @spialelo
To check the performance benefits, we tested Snow Leopard on three different systems: a 20-inch iMac Core 2 Duo/2.66GHz with 2GB of RAM; a 3GHz Xeon 5300 eight-core Mac Pro with 4GB of RAM (this Mac Pro was released in April 2007); and a 15-inch MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo/2.8GHz with 4GB of RAM.
The hard drives in each system were partitioned into two equal sizes, and we installed Leopard (OS 10.5.8) on one partition and Snow Leopard (OS 10.6) on the other. We booted into one OS, timed different tasks, then rebooted into the other OS and clocked those same tasks.
Here's a chart showing the percentage speed boosts (above 100%) or speed reductions (below 100%) we found when upgrading a system from Leopard to Snow Leopard. A score of 100% indicates that the test took the same time on both systems.

See also:
Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard review
NEXT: What’s faster in Snow Leopard
Continued...
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | NEXT >
Email A Friend
Email this article to a friend or colleague:
PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.
Permalink This Article
This articles permalink is:
http://www.macworld.co.uk/mac/news/index.cfm?RSS&NewsID=27015
<<prev article | back to news index | next article>>
Latest News
- Apple intros Aperture 3, adds over 200 new features
- VIP iPhone app drops from millionaire priced £279.99 to under a tenner
- Play.com: Google Nexus One now available for pre-order
- Amazon's Kindle gets ready to battle Apple's iPad
- Apple Store is down, new Macs imminent?
- Canon intros EOS 550D 18-megapixel DSLR camera
- WSJ: Apple could slash iPad prices if sales disappoint
- Apple offers 'find out how' tutorials as podcasts
- Adobe says sorry for 16-month-old Flash bug
- Getty launches subscription stock image service, Thinkstock
- RouteBuddy intros RouteBuddy Atlas 1.3 for iPhone, iPod touch
- AppFund seeks Apple iPad developers, offers funding up to $500,000

It's easy and free to get the latest news headlines, reviews and opinions straight to your email inbox. Sign up NOW to make sure you receive the latest Mac news, reviews and tutorials on your favourite topics.






Comments received
Elliot Richards said on Thu, 27 Aug 2009
Hmmm, somewhat interesting. I have the '07 Mac Pro with 8GB RAM, but I suspect a lot of Mac Pro users are running Pro Apps like Final Cut Studio, Logic, Creative Suite etc. I'd love to see audio/video benchmarks and I'm sure these will come. Reading this it seems little point for me to venture into town for Snow Leopard on the 28th.
iHuff said on Thu, 27 Aug 2009
I'd like to see some comparisons on older machines - for example a late 2006 2Ghz C2D Macbook running Tiger. What performance benefits will I see? (aside from the O/S enhancements and compatability gains)
Tim said on Thu, 27 Aug 2009
How about comparisons on Core Duo (as opposed to Core2 Duo) - from what I've read there doesn't sound like there will be any speed improvement on these older machines?
Pradumn said on Thu, 27 Aug 2009
I think it would be quite interesting to see how Snow Leopard works with Virtualisation - with Bootcamp and something like VMWare Fusion/Parallels
Ah-ha said on Thu, 27 Aug 2009
And still the iPhones burst into flames!
There's definitely said on Thu, 27 Aug 2009
a very poor standard of trolling here.
Archie said on Thu, 27 Aug 2009
Well I guess when you are so low down that's all you'll get.
Alex said on Fri, 28 Aug 2009
does the compressor test ran on 8core(qmaster) or just 2core? Macbook Pro 2.8 (08:56) vs Mac Pro (7:45), doesn't sounds correct!
Mack Tosh said on Sat, 12 Sep 2009
Notice.... Only stuff you do on the finder is faster, because it is now 64 bit. Most decent programs have been 64 bit for a while. So, no speed bump (Photoshop, iMovie, Logic, Final Cut, Compressor, etc.).
liam Taylor said on Fri, 18 Sep 2009
hay something seriously is wrong with the tests the mac pro 8 core test with compressor takes almost the same time as the dual core macs 8 core's = about a 600%-700% speed up in compression.
id rely like to know if the 8 cores are used more efficiently in 10.6 than 10.5
Disclaimer
Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Macworld. Macworld accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content.
Click here to read the house rules.
Click here for the latest reader comments