Skip to main content

Wed, 11 Nov 2009 Mac OS X 10.6.2 update breaks Hackintosh netbooks

Netbooks offer a much more cost-effective hardware platform than the pricey Apple hardware

Tony Bradley PCWorld.com


  • Email to a friend
  • Print this article
  • Bookmark this page
  • RSS feed

Users who want the Mac OS X experience on a netbook budget have figured out how to hack the Mac OS X operating system to force it to work on netbooks based on the Intel Atom processor. The latest update to Snow Leopard removes support for the Atom processor and puts an end to the “hackintosh” - at least for now.

Why would Apple do such a thing? Is Apple so bent on maintaining draconian control of the Mac OS X software and the hardware platform it runs on that it would risk the customer backlash that might come from breaking hackintosh netbooks? Well, yes and no.

What may seem like some sort of overbearing Napoleon complex by Steve Jobs from the outside is mainly Apple’s attempt to protect the Mac experience. Apple has achieved and maintains relatively high customer satisfactions ratings for its products as a result of managing virtually all aspects of the experience from the hardware devices, to the software that runs on them, to the environment at the stores and feel of the web sites where customers purchase them.

Viewed from that perspective, the move to squash the use of Mac OS X on unauthorised hardware makes some sense. Apple has built its reputation on providing a solid user experience, and if users start modifying the Mac OS X operating system to work on alternate hardware Apple can no longer guarantee the same environment. Users may have issues and start complaining about the Mac OS X operating system when the problem is really the fault of the untested hardware.

Does Microsoft care if you want to run Windows 7 on your Macbook? Not at all. Just make sure that your Windows 7 is a legally licensed and paid for copy of the operating system and you are good to go. Microsoft does not deal in PC hardware and it has decades of experience working to ensure that every new version of Windows and all of the service packs and updates in between will be compatible with a virtually limitless combination of hardware possibilities.

There is a method to Apple’s madness. It is willing to stick to its principles in terms of maintaining control of the experience from end to end, and sacrifice market share to do so. By restricting the hardware options the way it does, Apple pretty much ensures that it will grow much beyond the 5 per cent market share it currently has. But that 5 percent will be customers who are very satisfied with their operating system and hardware and will remain dedicated and ardent supporters of Apple.

The economy is down and unemployment is up. Netbooks offer a much more cost-effective hardware platform than the pricey Apple hardware, and the explosive growth of netbooks has led to record processor sales. But, to embrace that movement and claim the increase in market share that Mac OS X could experience as a result, Apple has to be open to ensuring that future updates and revisions will work on the diverse platforms to maintain satisfaction with the operating system. Welcome to Microsoft’s world.

This is probably not the end of the hackintosh story for Apple, though. They hacked it before, they’ll hack it again. Apple can look forward to a tug-of-war similar to the dueling updates it has been going through with Palm over syncing the Pre with iTunes. But if Apple wants to maintain the user experience, perhaps it’s a small price to pay.

[Tony Bradley tweets as @PCSecurityNews, and can be contacted at his Facebook page.]

Check out our new Macworld Mobile site.

Follow Macworld UK on twitter: www.twitter.com/macworlduk

Email A Friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:



PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.

<<prev article | back to news index | next article>>

Comments

What are your views on this subject? Use the form below to post a comment on this article up to 1000 characters.

Comments received


John Crawford said on Wed, 11 Nov 2009

Netbooks "a much more cost-effective hardware solution. Not necessarily. Depends what you want to do and the user experience while doing it (eg small screen, cramped keyboard etc.). "A much lower-cost hardware solution" would be more accurate.

Badger said on Wed, 11 Nov 2009

Obvious article is obvious.

John Crawford said on Wed, 11 Nov 2009

Netbooks "a much more cost-effective hardware solution. Not necessarily. Depends what you want to do and the user experience while doing it (eg small screen, cramped keyboard etc.). "A much lower-cost hardware solution" would be more accurate.

Chris M said on Wed, 11 Nov 2009

I don't get Netbooks to be honest, small screen, cramped keyboard and slow. I have a Macbook Air which does all I need on the move.

Bee said on Thu, 12 Nov 2009

This is why I don't have a mac book or any apple products. Can you say UNamerican? I love my dell mini 10. It has a 93% keyboard size and perfect to carry around. It's perfect for all I need. I'll leave the fruity company products to those who don't want choices or freedom. Apple IS so bent on maintaining draconian control of their products.

JOÃO FERREIRA said on Mon, 23 Nov 2009

EU GOSTO DE NOVA YORK

Click here for the latest reader comments

Disclaimer
Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Macworld. Macworld accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content.
Click here to read the house rules.


Latest News


More news...