Wed, 03 Jun 2009 Apple rejects Electronic Frontier Foundation app over YouTube f-word parody
Apple objects to subtitles in "Downfall" Hitler parody
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has become the latest victim of Apple's iTunes App Store "objectionable" content policy, after a submitted app was rejected over a link to a YouTube parody video.
Founded in 1990, the EFF is a donor-funded nonprofit organisation aimed at defending digital rights covering free speech, privacy, innovation, and consumer rights. The EFF often find themselves defending individuals against big business and US government in the courts.
Question of the day!
Do you share your creations online?
% of Macworld readers agree with you
What do you create and how do you share it?
Follow the conversation at @TabletChat
paintings & illustrations, mostly, which i upload to flickr.RT @fragmentedm
I draw manga/anime characters. I also do graphic design and photography.RT @spialelo
Yes. I usually put them up on my #deviantart account for feedback on how to improve.RT @spialelo
The EFF themed, but unofficial RSS feed, is the work of software developer Duane Fields of Exact Magic. It caught the eye of Apple's App Store approval team who rejected the application. Apple apparently objected to a blog post that linked to a "Downfall" parody video created by EFF Board Chairman Brad Templeton.
The parody casts Hitler in the role of entertainment industry executive, ranting about the failure of digital rights management (DRM) and the continued popularity of fair use. Among the subtitles is the f-word.

The objectionable f-word spotted by Apple.
As the EFF's Corynne McSherry points out in a Deeplinks Blog post anyone with an iPhone or iPod touch can already watch the YouTube video - via a bundled YouTube app or Safari browser - so the ban appears ineffective.
McSherry responds in the EFF post saying: "This is just the latest example of the failings of Apple's iTunes App Store approval process, which has been revealed to be not just anti-competitive, discriminatory, censorial, and arbitrary, but downright absurd."
"Let's be clear: we are not saying that Apple has to carry apps it doesn't like in its App Store. But iPhone owners who don't want Apple playing the role of language police for their software should have the freedom to go elsewhere. This is precisely why EFF has asked the Copyright Office to grant an exemption to the DMCA for jailbreaking iPhones. It's none of Apple's business if I want an app on my phone that lets me read EFF's RSS feed, use Sling Player over 3G, or read the Kama Sutra."
Check out our new Macworld Mobile site.
Follow Macworld UK on twitter: www.twitter.com/macworlduk
Email A Friend
Email this article to a friend or colleague:
PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.
Permalink This Article
This articles permalink is:
http://www.macworld.co.uk/mac/news/index.cfm?newsid=26182
<<prev article | back to news index | next article>>
Latest News
- Apple intros Aperture 3, adds over 200 new features
- VIP iPhone app drops from millionaire priced £279.99 to under a tenner
- Play.com: Google Nexus One now available for pre-order
- Amazon's Kindle gets ready to battle Apple's iPad
- Apple Store is down, new Macs imminent?
- Canon intros EOS 550D 18-megapixel DSLR camera
- WSJ: Apple could slash iPad prices if sales disappoint
- Apple offers 'find out how' tutorials as podcasts
- Adobe says sorry for 16-month-old Flash bug
- Getty launches subscription stock image service, Thinkstock
- RouteBuddy intros RouteBuddy Atlas 1.3 for iPhone, iPod touch
- AppFund seeks Apple iPad developers, offers funding up to $500,000

It's easy and free to get the latest news headlines, reviews and opinions straight to your email inbox. Sign up NOW to make sure you receive the latest Mac news, reviews and tutorials on your favourite topics.






Comments received
James Donevan said on Wed, 03 Jun 2009
Notwithstanding the obvious shortcomings of Apple's review process, I'm curious if Corynne advocates viewing whatever she wants on her TV. Does the EFF challenge all censorship or just the issues that will get it ink?
Dragonfly said on Wed, 03 Jun 2009
And there's me using Fu*king asterisks on such words to try to protect (us) Macworld reader's sensibilities, and MW come straight out with it in their news item. I'm stupefied ! :-O :-)
Dan said on Wed, 03 Jun 2009
Look at the EFF website James they make it pretty clear what they stand for. I'm sure they helped get rid of DRM on MP3s which can only be a good thing.
Apple need to lighten up.
Apple Thought Police said on Wed, 03 Jun 2009
You will do as we say, not as you think.
Alix said on Wed, 03 Jun 2009
You have to be a freetard to think this video is funny.
James said on Wed, 03 Jun 2009
You have to be a pleb to want to block it.
freetard said on Wed, 03 Jun 2009
Love the video, brilliant.
Macworld Admin said on Wed, 03 Jun 2009
@Dragonfly
We have made a very rare exception because the image in question is in relation to a story, which we feel is part of a larger ongoing story regarding the Apple approval process, and not featuring it would seem odd; and asterixing it out would misrepresent it.
As a general rule we still don't curse in our articles and don't want our comments / forums to become a swear filled slanging match.
No, I'm Freetard said on Wed, 03 Jun 2009
Outstanding
Disclaimer
Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Macworld. Macworld accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content.
Click here to read the house rules.
Click here for the latest reader comments