Earlier this week, Apple released Final Cut Pro X, the long awaited successor to Apple's tried and true FCP 7. Available for $299 via the Mac App Store, FCP X brings with it a number of new features such as a magnetic timeline, content auto analysis, and background rendering that enables you to keep on working while your Mac chugs away.
"Final Cut Pro X is the biggest advance in Pro video editing since the original Final Cut Pro," said Philip Schiller, Apple's senior vice president of Worldwide Product Marketing. "We have shown it to many of the world's best Pro editors, and their jaws have dropped."
"I'm blown away by what Apple has done with Final Cut Pro," said Angus Wall, Academy Award-winning film editor. "Final Cut Pro X is incredibly modern and fast, but most importantly it lets you focus on telling your story in the most creative way, while it actively manages all of the technical details."
That sounds great, right?

The only thing is that professional video editors are dead serious about their craft Apple's from the ground re-write of Final Cut Pro isn't going over so well with everyone. Indeed, message boards and Twitter are both filled with complaints about the software, with many dismissively calling FCP X nothing more thaniMovie Pro.
So what are some of the more common complaints?
Well, not only is there a completely new interface a'la iMovie, but there's currently no multi-cam support, no export-to-tape feature, no support for EDL, XML, and OMF files, no apparent support for third partyplugins just yet, and gasp!, FCP X users can't import their current Final Cut Pro 7 projects. And that of course is just the beginning of a litany of user complaints. So basically, a good number of Pro users are passionately arguing that Apple's latest offering is decidedly not geared for the Pro user.
And the masses have spoken as well. At the time of this writing, FCP X has a 2.5 star rating on iTunes out of 854 reviews and 395 1-star reviews.
One review reads: "I can't believe what apple did with FCP X... this is no longer a professional application... this is just an upgrade of iMovie!!! You can't view an external monitor like a production monitor, hundreds of preferences and features are GONE!! Settings are GONE as well..."
And another: I run my business on FCP and my first impression of the new app is that it is horrible. This is an enhanced version of iMovie. It DOES NOT open your existing FCP files. Simple navigating and cutting is difficult. Cannot add the new icon to my dock. Hands on manual color correction is gone and replaced with presets. I'm sure you can tweak these, but this isn't iMOvie!!!! It's FCP, the key being PRO!!"
To be fair, the software is less than a week old and Apple has promised that updates will be issued at a much faster clip than in years past. Still, and as David Pogue points out in his NYT review of the software, this is all eerily similar to when Apple completely did away with iMovie HD and replaced it with the current incarnation of iMovie. If you recall, the update completely cut out a number of useful features and the end result was a product that was undeniably "less than." I'm still not too thrilled about it in case you can't tell!
But Apple is no stranger to rocking the boat and we can only imagine, or at least hope, that significant software updates will be fast approaching and will soon satiate even the most critical of video editors.
At the same time, some are extremely excited about FCP X, despite it's current limitations.
Steve Martin (not the actor) writes:
While FCP X will no doubt be referred to as a souped up version of iMovie by some, this is not my impression at all. I have been cutting a documentary on it among other things, and I just finished a tutorial that is close to 5 hours long which speaks to it's depth. I was very surprised at how much iron the Apple engineers put into it.
FCP guru Lary Jordan, meanwhile, writes the following:
In three words – speed, power, cutting-edge.
...
Just as the transcontinental railroad permanently changed 19th century America – in a wide variety of ways – Final Cut Pro X has the same capability.
During the last several months, I've had extensive discussions with engineers and product managers at Apple, read virtually all the Help files and, more recently, been running the software itself...
In every conversation I've had with Apple, each person stressed: "The easy thing would be to just create an incremental upgrade. But, we felt that while the current version of Final Cut held up well for the last ten years, it wasn't ready for the next ten. We needed to design something from the ground up to take us into the next ten years."
Of course, these folks make their living in party via FCP tutorials so keep that in mind.
As someone who, again, is still disappointed that Apple ditched iMovie HD and replaced it with the current style of iMovie, I can only hope that Apple will work quickly to rectify some of the more glaring omissions from Final Cut Pro X.


It's easy and free to get the latest news headlines, reviews and opinions straight to your email inbox. Sign up NOW to make sure you receive the latest Mac news, reviews and tutorials on your favourite topics.






Comments received
rd@rolanddenning said on Fri, 24 Jun 2011
As someone who has worked professionally with FCP for many years this marks a break with mid/high end users. Avid will now consolidate its hold on that end of the market.
Clearly Apple realises the big market for FCP is the individual independent filmmaker. For them, this release is a powerful, innovative, good value solution. For commercial edit houses and those who work on a lot of different projects it's a disaster. Not being backward compatible alone makes it useless for those with legacy projects.
To release this alongside FCP 7 would be one thing, but to remove FCP 7 from sale will mean pro houses will shift to Avid. Apple may gain mass market sales but will lose the prestige of feature film and high-end TV credits. Those facilities who have invested heavily in FCP will not forget this - whatever the advantages of FCPX it is no longer 'pro' (not 'final').
Time to consider the open source beta of LIghtworks?
rd@rolanddenning said on Fri, 24 Jun 2011
correction:... no longer 'pro' (nor 'final')
rd@rolanddenning said on Fri, 24 Jun 2011
As someone who has worked professionally with FCP for many years this marks a break with mid/high end users. Avid will now consolidate its hold on that end of the market.
Clearly Apple realises the big market for FCP is the individual independent filmmaker. For them, this release is a powerful, innovative, good value solution. For commercial edit houses and those who work on a lot of different projects it's a disaster. Not being backward compatible alone makes it useless for those with legacy projects.
To release this alongside FCP 7 would be one thing, but to remove FCP 7 from sale will mean pro houses will shift to Avid. Apple may gain mass market sales but will lose the prestige of feature film and high-end TV credits. Those facilities who have invested heavily in FCP will not forget this - whatever the advantages of FCPX it is no longer 'pro' (not 'final').
Time to consider the open source beta of LIghtworks?
hughmass said on Fri, 24 Jun 2011
But the make-up sex will be great! I hated imovie 08 when it came out, but watched as Apple dug in, listened to the complaints, and built the superior iMovie 11. I am a home consumer who loves the version I just paid for, but am sure in a year it will be up to all but the most picky pro's standards.
I do wish Apple had taken me up on my suggestion and had two different FCPX discussion boards, one for pros to yell, and one for the rest of us to relax and get to work learning it. And yes, if I were a pro, I would be giving Apple an ultimatum, if you want my business, you have to make certain changes. That is just business. Hugh
rd@rolanddenning said on Fri, 24 Jun 2011
Yes - for consumers FCP X will be great and Apple will sell shed loads.
But pros aren't complaining for the sake of it - there are real problems here that make it unusable. In a year's time most mid/high end users will have migrated to Avid which listens to and caters for that market. Avid were very complacent when FCP arrived and FCP got a good share of that market. Now Avid will reclaim it.
Disclaimer
Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Macworld. Macworld accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content.
Click here to read the house rules.
Click here for the latest reader comments