A Washington man has sued Symantec in federal court, accusing it of using the same tactics as fake "scareware" software to sell its PC cleanup utilities.
Symantec said the lawsuit was without merit, and promised to defend its practices.
The lawsuit, which was filed in a California federal court by lawyers representing Washington State resident James Gross, charged Symantec with deceptive business practices, fraud and other violations of state and federal laws.
Gross took exception to the way Symantec promotes a trio of tools: PC Tools Registry Mechanic, PC Tools Performance Toolkit and Norton Utilities. According to Gross, Symantec pitches those programs with a free diagnostic scan that consistently posts menacing warnings that the customer's PC needs maintenance. To fix the all the problems, however, the user must pay for the software.
Those are the same schemes used by "scareware" makers to con customers into forking over money for essentially worthless security software, said Gross.
The paradox wasn't lost on Gross, who cited research on scareware programs from Symantec's own security research arm.
"In what can only be described as supreme irony, or a clever attempt by Defendant to persuade customers to choose its own 'legitimate' computer utility software, the results of Symantec's research succinctly capture the fraud at issue in this lawsuit," said Gross' complaint.
Scareware, also called "rogueware" by some experts, has been an extremely lucrative marketing strategy for cyber criminals, who have made millions off the practice of faking infection claims and then selling bogus software that does nothing to alleviate the imagined problems.
Both Windows and Mac users have been targeted by scareware authors.
Citing unnamed computer forensics experts that Gross claimed to have hired, the complaint said Symantec's for-free diagnostic scan "always reports that the user's computer's 'System Health" is 'LOW,' that 'High Priority' errors exist on the system, and that the user's 'Privacy Health' and 'Disk Health' are 'LOW."
Gross said that his experts determined that, "By any stretch of the imagination, the errors detected as 'High Priority' are not credible threats [Emphasis in original] to a computer's functionality."
That practice -- where problems are always found -- is also a classic strategy used by scareware distributors.
Gross wasn't above dubbing Symantec's diagnostic and utilities software as scareware, repeatedly using the term in place of the products' actual names.
"Symantec intentionally designed its Scareware to invariably report, in an extremely ominous manner, that harmful errors, privacy risks, and other computer problems exist on the user's PC, regardless of the actual conditions of the consumer's computer."
Gross also alleged that the for-a-fee software doesn't actually conduct any diagnostic testing of the computer, and thus dupes users into "purchasing software that does not function as advertised, and in fact, has very little (if any) utility."
The complaint asked for class-action status, which if approved by the court would open the lawsuit to all U.S. buyers of the three Symantec programs.
Gross requested damages, both actual and punitive, and asked the court to bar Symantec from using the alleged practices to sell the software.
In a statement today, Symantec countered Gross' claims.
"Symantec does not believe the lawsuit has merit and will vigorously defend the case," the company said. "Several independent third parties have tested and reviewed these products very favorably, verifying the effectiveness of their functionality."
A free scan using Symantec's PC Tools Registry Mechanic reported that a little-used Windows 7 machine had hundreds of problems and was in extremely poor 'system health.'