Thu, 16 Sep 2004 'We copied iTunes' – Microsoft
Microsoft has admitted that it 'copied' Apple's iTunes Music Store.
The company, which has just released a beta version of its music store, told The New York Times: "Apple set the bar very high. We told our developers: 'Look at how Apple does it'."
Question of the day!
Do you share your creations online?
% of Macworld readers agree with you
What do you create and how do you share it?
Follow the conversation at @TabletChat
Varies... from vector artwork to photo manips. I add them to my portfolio and/or my DA account & then provide links.RT @MrRyanDee
sometimes photography, it gets shared on the free stock photography sites, give back what you get, I use them so i put back.RT @edjonesy
I've just used iWork to share a presentation. I use MobileMe to share photos too.RT @markhattersley
The NY Times compares the two stores, stating that: "The Microsoft music store couldn't look more like Apple's iTunes music store if you ran it through a copying machine."
The report goes on to draw the following parallels: "It is priced the same (99 cents a song, $10 an album) and comes with the same rights – the user can copy to 5 computers, burn up to seven copies of the same playlist onto CD's, and download to unlimited pocket players.
"You get the same 30-second previews for free, you use the same Genre pop-up menu for browsing, and you use the same sort of jukebox software to manage your music collection (Windows Media Player 10, which serves the function of Apple's iTunes program). And you get the same one-way auto-synching feature to a pocket music player."
In the light of the similarities, the report asks: "If all other variables are equal (price, selection, features), which music system do people like better: Apple's or Microsoft's?"
Extras?
While Apple can claim many features that Microsoft can’t, there are a few extras Microsoft can boast that Apple can't. These are albums by Radiohead, AC/DC, Metallica and the Red Hot Chili Peppers. However, notes the report, "there's a catch: you can't buy individual songs from these albums. You have to buy the entire CD's worth".
It is this factor that the NY Times thinks is the real reason why Apple doesn't offer music from these bands. It explains: "It's pretty obvious why Apple and its rivals chose not to list these recalcitrant artists at all. First, the ability to cherry-pick only the desirable songs is a hugely important feature of an online music store. Losing that right is a big setback for the consumer, and possibly the top of a slippery slope to less freedom and more money-grubbing by the record companies."
Email A Friend
Email this article to a friend or colleague:
PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.
Permalink This Article
This articles permalink is:
http://www.macworld.co.uk/news/index.cfm?NewsID=9651
<<prev article | back to news index | next article>>
Latest News
- WSJ: Apple could slash iPad prices if sales disappoint
- Amazon's Kindle gets ready to battle Apple's iPad
- Apple Store is down, new Macs imminent?
- Canon intros EOS 550D 18-megapixel DSLR camera
- Apple offers 'find out how' tutorials as podcasts
- Adobe says sorry for 16-month-old Flash bug
- Getty launches subscription stock image service, Thinkstock
- RouteBuddy intros RouteBuddy Atlas 1.3 for iPhone, iPod touch
- AppFund seeks Apple iPad developers, offers funding up to $500,000
- Glu intros 1000: Find 'Em All! for iPhone
- CubeMe Google Chrome plug-in shows how Adobe Flash will look on iPad
- QuarkXPress 8 BOGOF offer extended until 28 February

It's easy and free to get the latest news headlines, reviews and opinions straight to your email inbox. Sign up NOW to make sure you receive the latest Mac news, reviews and tutorials on your favourite topics.






Click here for the latest reader comments