Skip to main content

Thu, 11 May 2006 Amended French copyright bill gives Apple a break

Peter Sayer


  • Email to a friend
  • Print this article
  • Bookmark this page
  • RSS feed

The French Senate approved a new copyright bill Wednesday, but amended it to soften the contentious demand that digital music services like iTunes should open up their DRM (digital rights management) technologies to competitors.

When the French National Assembly voted an earlier draft of the bill in March, Apple accused it of "state-sponsored piracy" because of its efforts to give music buyers freedom to choose the equipment they used to listen to tracks they had purchased. The Assembly had sought to make digital music vendors provide full details of their DRM systems to those wishing to create interoperable systems. This would have forced Apple to provide other music store operators or music player manufacturers with details of the FairPlay technology it uses to lock tracks bought through its iTunes music store so that they will only play on an iPod, or on a computer running its iTunes jukebox software. So far, it has refused to license the technology to other vendors.

Question of the day!

Mark Hattersley
Editor in Chief

Do you share your creations online?

Question of the day!

Do you share your creations online?

% of Macworld readers agree with you

Yes
TBC
No
TBC

What do you create and how do you share it?

124 characters remaining

Follow the conversation at @TabletChat

paintings & illustrations, mostly, which i upload to flickr.RT @fragmentedm

I draw manga/anime characters. I also do graphic design and photography.RT @spialelo

Yes. I usually put them up on my #deviantart account for feedback on how to improve.RT @spialelo

The text of the bill approved by senators on Wednesday retains the principle of DRM interoperability, but opens a loophole allowing companies to keep their technology secret, which should please Apple, but may not leave consumers as happy.

Senators weakened the bill's blanket requirement that vendors give details of their DRM technology to those wishing to develop interoperable systems. Instead, they voted to create a new regulatory authority responsible for mediating requests for such details.

The authority will have the power to order companies to share details of their DRM, but companies will be able to refuse as long as their DRM systems only limit usage of digital music or movies in a way approved by the author or copyright holder.

That means that music store operators can duck the interoperability requirement by renegotiating deals with record labels and artists - for example by signing exclusive distribution contracts - something the copyright holders might agree to if convinced it will enhance the security of the DRM systems protecting their works.

Developers of open source software seeking to make their code interoperable with DRM-protected systems and files will also face a challenge: DRM technology owners will be allowed to prohibit publication of source code developed using the details they provide, if they can show that such publication would seriously effect the security and effectiveness of their DRM system.

Email A Friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:



PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.

<<prev article | back to news index | next article>>


Latest News


More news...