Thu, 17 Sep 2009 FreeHand fans fight on despite Snow Leopard
Some bugs when running FreeHand 11.0.2 in OS X 10.5 and 10.6 require complicated workarounds
Fans of vector tool FreeHand are fighting on despite the application struggling to perform fully under Apple's recent Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard update.
Some bugs when running FreeHand 11.0.2 in OS X 10.5 and 10.6 require complicated workarounds.
Question of the day!
Do you share your creations online?
% of Macworld readers agree with you
What do you create and how do you share it?
Follow the conversation at @TabletChat
paintings & illustrations, mostly, which i upload to flickr.RT @fragmentedm
I draw manga/anime characters. I also do graphic design and photography.RT @spialelo
Yes. I usually put them up on my #deviantart account for feedback on how to improve.RT @spialelo
Some examples include:
• PDF export does not support overprint colours or bleed.
• Gradients often break: gradients within an EPS export may contain white lines, gradients within a PDF export may get breaks at the edges.
• Fonts often don't print correctly (requires conversion to paths prior to printing).
• Does not run natively on Intel Macs.
The bugs have been noted by the FreeFreeHand Organization, a group dedicated to keeping the application alive, who point out the application will still work for those running Snow Leopard, after installing Rosetta, the binary translation software that makes PowerPC-based applications run on Intel Macs.
The group was formed earlier this year by the designer and illustrator Thomas Thü Hürlimann, former Art Director of Macworld and Computerworld Switzerland, who has worked with FreeHand since 1987 (Aldus version 1.0), and Jabez Palmer of Bez Design, Seattle , whose first experience with MacDraw on a Macintosh Plus in 1986.
The FreeFreeHand Organization aims are to ensure updates are made available and the current owner agrees to release FreeHand code and licensing to the opensource community for maintenance and further development for an agreed-upon price. The group currently has 1777 members. Full details of the campaign can be found at FreeFreeHand.org.
FreeHand is an award winning tool for creating vector illustrations, which was discontinued when Adobe bought Macromedia. Adobe claimed the application was similar to Adobe Illustrator and one had to go.
Check out our new Macworld Mobile site.
Follow Macworld UK on twitter: www.twitter.com/macworlduk
Email A Friend
Email this article to a friend or colleague:
PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.
Permalink This Article
This articles permalink is:
http://www.macworld.co.uk/procreative/news/index.cfm?newsid=27196
<<prev article | back to news index | next article>>
Latest News
- Apple intros Aperture 3, adds over 200 new features
- Walt Disney World iPhone update offers 300 pages, 500 photos
- VIP iPhone app drops from millionaire priced £279.99 to under a tenner
- Play.com: Google Nexus One now available for pre-order
- Amazon's Kindle gets ready to battle Apple's iPad
- Apple Store is down, new Macs imminent?
- Canon intros EOS 550D 18-megapixel DSLR camera
- WSJ: Apple could slash iPad prices if sales disappoint
- Apple offers 'find out how' tutorials as podcasts
- Adobe says sorry for 16-month-old Flash bug
- Getty launches subscription stock image service, Thinkstock
- RouteBuddy intros RouteBuddy Atlas 1.3 for iPhone, iPod touch

It's easy and free to get the latest news headlines, reviews and opinions straight to your email inbox. Sign up NOW to make sure you receive the latest Mac news, reviews and tutorials on your favourite topics.





Comments received
Andy Shorrock said on Thu, 17 Sep 2009
Aldus Freehand 1.0 - Heavens. Anyone remember Aldus Persuasion? Before M$ 'gave away' copies of PowerPoint? bundled with Word & Excel it was the canine's dangly bits in presentation
Or am I just showing my age again?
Tom said on Thu, 17 Sep 2009
Why didn't Adobe just incorporate the best features of Freehand into Illustrator? The ability to paste objects into other objects was much better that the masking feature in Adobes's software. Also multiple pages and gradient's that followed a curved path were great.
Does Adobe care about its customers any longer?
Nick said on Thu, 17 Sep 2009
My friend who is a respected illustrator still uses FH, and last year I visited a large studio still using FH. They didn't seem that impressed with Illustrator.
mmmmark said on Thu, 17 Sep 2009
I own and use Freehand in my current job and have used it since 2.0 for dtp and technical illustration. I have had to become adept at Illustrator by necessity, but I prefer many features of Freehand. I agree with Tom's assessment and have been frustrated that Adobe didn't at least see the value in including some great features of Freehand into Illustrator. You appease us "somewhat" and at least show deference to the loyal Freehand users of years gone by.
Cartographers still use Freehand and do not like Illustrator for the most part. I do not have direct knowledge of other "niches".
D9 said on Thu, 17 Sep 2009
Oh, yeah, Andy...I remember well the Aldus "suite" of Pagemaker, Freehand & Persuasion! It really was the defining apps for the desktop revolution. Those and that new app Photoshop from this small company named Adobe.
For quite some time, really up until the launch of the CS suite, we used Freehand almost exclusively. Illustrator had numerous bugs and did not accommodate multiple pages. In a lot of ways, Freehand is still superior to Illustrator.
But I guess that's neither here nor there these days, despite this effort.
Gary Piland said on Thu, 17 Sep 2009
I doubt Adobe really cares about Freehand users and what they do or don't want. Adobe is a monopoly - thank you FTC - and probably assumes everyone will kowtow to them and switch to Illustrator.
Now, if someone could offer an illustration program that imported Freehand files in good shape and offered most if not all of the advantages of Freehand, Adobe could be made to understand the dangers of thinking like a monopoly.
And, that somebody could make a fortune in the bargain. Any takers?
FarmerBob said on Thu, 17 Sep 2009
Upon the news of Adobe buying Macromedia, other than crying, I called my MM Tech Rep and asked if Adobe was going to trash FH since it had Ill? He connected me with the new Adobe Prod Rep and I was assured that FH would stay in the product line, be an updated product and not to worry. Like I said, it's Adobe.
I have used FH in every capacity from V1. It was always quicker, faster, and BETTER than Illustrator. I could get the same amount and quality of work done in a fraction of the time. And making changes was a breeze. I have even converted people that started on Ill, and they went nuts. To this day, it's still a bit of a running joke how we now regard Illustrator and Freehand. Matter of fact, my nickname was "The Freehand Guy" by the techs at my service bureau. I have always thought of FH for Graphic Arts and Ill for Fine Art. I don't do fine art.
So knowing Adobe, then reading this, I am not surprised. But will be glad, interested and relieved in FH being in the "wild".
Bez Palmer said on Fri, 18 Sep 2009
FH deserves life. Or rather, those who prefer FH over AI––or anything else-–deserve to have that choice honored and respected by the company that callously bought and killed FH. But that's not what Adobe is all about, apparently. Let's build a grassroots movement to take destiny into our own hands. In order to succeed, we need numbers. 1,800 members in just over a week is a good start, but we need to multiply that by 10--then we might really have a chance. Join today, it's free, at www.freefreehand.org And for the record, the FTC, as well as a number of other government and rights advocacy organizations, have heard from us recently.
vader said on Fri, 18 Sep 2009
freehand is still king! always loved it's simplicity compared to illustrator's stupidly over-precise selection methods.why on earth adobe don't make freehand the basic version of illustrator and illustrator as the more advanced version?
CWA Lammy said on Tue, 29 Sep 2009
Freehand is still useful, and really what would be so hard about someone at Adobe giving us a "one-click" solution to make Ill behave like FH?
I would PAY for Ill if they did that. (I paid for FH, actually paid. Ill gives me so much grief, Adobe should be paying me!
Disclaimer
Opinions expressed here are those of the writers and do not reflect those of Macworld. Macworld accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for their accuracy of content.
Click here to read the house rules.
Click here for the latest reader comments