The Apple Mac an obvious choice for those looking for a computer to make music with. The choice can be overwhelming though with devices from a few hundred pounds or dollars to thousands more than you might spend on a car. We compare them all and explain which Mac is right for you - MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iMac, Mac mini and Mac Pro.
There was a time when music production required hiring a studio for the kind of money that would buy you a house. But time and technology moves fast. During the 1980s, there was a revolution in analogue home-recording kit; then the 1990s saw home computers gradually take over. Today, you can do everything from recording pop songs to mastering movie soundtracks on a Mac. But which Mac? That’s the question we’re here to answer!
Mac vs PC for music production
Whether you choose a Mac or PC for music production is largely down to the platform you prefer and who you’re collaborating with. There’s little inherent advantage to using Macs when it comes to hardware, beyond familiarity with the system, and the general.
GarageBand is essentially a toy, albeit a powerful one in the right hands. It’s fine for the odd bit of recording and play, but pros favour more flexible software. Logic Pro X remains popular for recording work, as do the cross-platform Cubase, Ableton Live and Pro Tools.
RAM and storage
Music software is notoriously hungry for memory. A lack of RAM becomes a serious bottleneck in any pro-level project. You’ll be able to run fewer instruments and fewer effects; you’ll spend more time rendering and less time doing things live. With the majority of Macs no longer allowing you to later upgrade RAM, buy what you can afford during purchase. Consider 16GB your minimum.
Storage is also an issue. Hard drives can be a bottleneck due to their relatively low speed compared to SSDs, and they can be noisy. However, SSDs start out much smaller than hard drives, and are far more expensive. Entry-level Apple notebooks have 128GB SSDs, but pro instrument and effects collections when installed can require hundreds of GB.
So you must figure out what you’ll need, and how assets will be stored. External drives can be fine for large sample libraries and the like, especially when connected using Thunderbolt, but you then need to determine how to take everything with you if you’re a musician who works with people in many different locations.
Portability and connections
Before buying a Mac you must decide whether you need it to be portable or not. If you’re always moving around, working with various musicians in different countries, a massive iMac won’t fit in your hand luggage. But if you’re a solo musician who only ever creates music in a home studio, you get more bang for your buck with a desktop machine.
You also need to examine other kit you want to use. If you don’t have any — if all of your music-making happens inside a Mac — then this won’t be a concern, and in theory any Mac might do. But if you’ve a pile of audio interfaces, USB instruments, headphones, monitors, and other vital hardware, trying to get by with the USB-C port on the MacBook (no longer in Apple's range) or Macbook Air will drive you to despair.
We wouldn’t recommend the MacBook for music anyway — it’s too underpowered; but you get the general point.
Processing power for music production on a Mac
High-end audio work can be extremely processor intensive, especially when using professional plug-ins and effects. If your demands are great, you’re going to need a Mac with fairly serious processing power. Ergo, whichever Mac you decide to buy, avoid low-end models that seem to lurk in the line-up to enable Apple to say ‘from’ and use a lower price-tag in marketing material.
Thanks to a hardware refresh in 2019, its the iMac range that has the latest and greatest processors from Intel. That doesn't mean you should choose one based on that, though. See more information below.
There’s also the question of the GPU. Historically, recording and editing audio didn’t utilise many graphics card resources, unlike 3D design and video editing. Things are more complicated these days as some audio software is GPU-accelerated. It's also a factor should you require additional displays.
Best studio Mac for musicians: iMac
The iMac is a great choice for a lot of people. It's an elegant and powerful all-in-one solution that will fit perfectly into any studio.
There are, of course, various models to choose from but we should note straight away that you should avoid the cheapest option. The £1,049/$1,099 is actually the old model with outdated specs like a dual-core 7th-gen Intel processor and Full HD screen.
The screen size of 21.5-inch might not be enough so you can jump to the 27-inch 5K iMac which has also been update for 2019 with new hardware. It still starts at £1,749/$1,799 and go up to £2,249$2,299 (without optional extras). At the least you get a six-core Intel 8th-gen Core i5, a Radeon Pro 570X and 1TB Fusion Drive.
Connections-wise, you get four USB 3 ports and two Thunderbolt 3/USB Type C ports. The latter is great for fast external storage, leaving the former for accessories and instruments that use the legacy USB connector. There’s a headphone jack, for when you’re not using monitors and/or an external interface for headphones.
There is, of course, the iMac Pro if you're happy to drop £4,899/$4,999 on one - at the least. It's a stunning machine with an 8-core Intel Xeon W processor, 32GB of RAM, 1TB of SSD storage and a Radeon Pro Vega 56 with 8GB of memory as standard. That should be plenty of power even if you're doing more demanding work. Read our iMac Pro review for more information.
Depending on how much power and what size screen you need, the iMac is likely to be a great choice. Just don't consider the cheapest model.
Best portable Mac for musicians: MacBook Pro
If you’re a musician on the road, avoid the discontinued MacBook as it's simply not powerful enough and only has a single USB-C port. The MacBook Air got an update in 2019, but is bearely any different to the MacBook Air 2018. Its got a TrueTone display but isn't any more powerful and also relies on USB-C.
The only Apple notebook really worth consideration for music-making is the MacBook Pro. Just bear in mind the fans can get loud, if you're recording in the same room.
Apple has updated the MacBook Pro range twice in 2019 so they all have the Touch Bar - which might come in handy with some music production software.
There are still four 13in models to choose from with the cheapest two being the most recently updated with 8th-generation Intel Core i5 processors and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645. The MacBook Pro 13in starts at £1,299/$1,299. All processors are now quad-core but you might want to upgrade the RAM from the standard 8GB.
If you want a larger screen and dedicated graphics card, you can even leap up to £2,349/$2,399 for the 15in MacBook Pro, which is a great choice - even without adding any upgrades as it's got a 9th-gen Core i7 6-core processor, 16GB RAM and a 256GB SSD. The 15in MacBook Pro models also benefit from separate graphics cards: in this case the Radeon Pro 555X.
The entire MacBook Pro range is decent depending on your budget and needs. Just note that the cheapest two 13in models only have two Thunderbolt 3 ports.
Best Mac for musicians on a budget: Mac mini
If funds are low, the Mac mini is a reasonably good choice for making music. It’s small, quiet, and has similar connectivity to the iMac, along with an additional audio-in port (although musicians typically prefer using USB audio interfaces).
The cheapest option is the 3.6GHz quad-core i3, with a 128GB SSD at just £799/$799. Double the RAM to 16GB, for a grand total of £979.
Since Apple updated the mini in October 2018 we've been pleasantly surprised by just how good the machine is. And it just so happens that Apple showed us a demo of someone using the mini to produce and record music.
Be mindful that with a Mac mini you’ll also need to buy a display, keyboard and mouse.
Read our Mac mini (2018) review.
Best Mac for musicians if money is no object: Mac Pro
If you’re made of money, by all means ignore our advice regarding the iMac and MacBook Pro and buy a Mac Pro - one of it's benefits is the fact that it offers whisper quiet operation which is important if you're doing recording and don't want fan noise in the background.
As promised, a new Mac Pro is arriving autumn (fall) 2019 and this machine is a beast. If you want, it can come with a 28-core Intel Xeon W, up to 1.5TB of DDR4 ECC memory and dual AMD Radeon Pro Vega II graphics cards.
This is overkill for most music production but if you want the most powerful machine possible - perhaps if you want to do other work with it too - then you're looking right at it. You’ll at least know you won’t run out of power. You might, however, run out of money paying for the thing. It starts at an eye-watering $5,999.
You might want to find a second-hand or refubished older Mac Pro for something cheaper.
Best Mac overall for making music
It's hard to pick a single Mac to recommend to everyone but it is easy to give two options.
If you're looking for a Mac that will simply stay put in a studio (bedroom or otherwise), then look to the iMac. It’s powerful enough for the majority of music-making tasks, has a gorgeous display, and boasts enough connections for kit and expansion.
Bar the entry-level 21.5-inch model, any of Apple’s existing line-up will do, but we’d go for the 27-inch 5K model if your budget can stretch. The screen’s larger, of course, and you can can configure up to 64GB of RAM which is double the smaller model. The iMac Pro will likely be overkill for most people.
If you’re a mobile musician, go for the MacBook Pro. Just be mindful of how much RAM you get as you'll need to upgrade when you purchase. Our pick of the bunch is the cheaper MacBook Pro 15in.
It's £2,349/$2,399 and has a decent set of specs without having to configure anything, although you might want to if you can afford it.