Newspapers and magazines, news agencies, bloggers and websites have for decades kept regularly updated obituaries of public figures and celebrities in the safe knowledge that everyone dies eventually. In the case of Keith Richards this has meant a lot of updating for no reward. And sometimes newsmen write up the wrong people. For instance, who’d have thought that the first of the Fairytale of New York duo to die would be Kirsty McColl and not Shane McGowan?
But actually publishing a person’s obituary is a rarity. Mark Twain was forced to quip "The report of my death was an exaggeration" when the New York Journal ran a story on his apparent death in 1897. He died 13 years later.
In August 2008 newswire Bloomberg accidentally published its 17-page obituary for Steve Jobs, marked “Hold for release – Do not use”. The obituary embarrassingly contained blank spaces for his age and cause of death to be inserted. It also included praise from arch-rival Microsoft boss Bill Gates, and details of other Jobs friends and colleagues to be contacted by Bloomberg in the event of his death.
Jobs responded at an Apple keynote a month later by quoting Twains "Reports of my death are greatly exaggerated” line. At a later media event Jobs finished his presentation with a slide reading "110/70", referring to his blood pressure.
In the end the media splurged semi-obituaries when Jobs quit as CEO and became Chairman. A few weeks later Steve was dead, and another avalanche of obituaries hit the wires.
Otherwise there'd be no more …
One more thing
We might never see another Steve Jobs keynote again but we’ll all remember his mostly fantastic ‘One More Thing’ conclusions.
Steve would wrap up his presentation list of stats, review of positive sales, new products, latest adverts and introductions to a few people very very boring because they weren’t Steve not with a bow or a chorus line knees up with Phil Schiller but with a three-word slide that got everyone’s adrenaline pumping.
The products or services revealed during ‘OMT’ don't all look so exciting now, but included: AirPort Wi-Fi (exciting at the time), PowerBook G4 (nice), Power Mac G5 (didn’t mention its god-awful buzz), video iPod (wow), MacBook Pro (still looked like a PowerBook), iPod shuffle (double wow), Apple TV (rubbish), Safari for Windows (yawn!), iPod touch (very nice), MacBook Air (you know, in that envelope), MacBook not Pro, video-camera-toting iPod nano (why did they scrap it?), Facetime (nice), Apple TV again (still rubbish), and MacBook Air (no doubt even thinner and with even less slots).
See Mac OS X.
The media fascination with Apple co-founder Steve Jobs reached a new high on news of his August 2011 resignation as CEO. Apple is doomed cried many. It’s business as usual, calmed others. But Steve resigning has happened before – and then he left the company altogether (he remains as Chairman today, although in poor health). What was the outcry then? Not so different, but certainly less affectionate.
In 1985, just a year after the revolutionary launch of the Macintosh itself, Steve Jobs found himself clearing his desk at Apple’s Cupertino HQ. Into the hemp bag went his signed photo of Woz, Mont Blanc pen and “You’re Fired!” ink-stamp. Jobs had been forced out of the company he’d founded after a power struggle with John Sculley, the Pepsi marketing whizz he’d recruited as CEO to turn Apple into the first true consumer computer brand.
When news reached Sculley that Jobs was planning a coup, he acted fast – forcing Steve into the non-operational role as company chairman.
“There is no role for Steve Jobs in the running of this company either today or in the future. But there is a role for Steve Jobs as chairman of the board,” said Sculley, smiting his old pal.
Sensing defeat, Steve got the hump and resigned, taking a small crew of Apple staff with him to go off and form his next company, simply called NeXT.
”We have the foundations in place for a really great Apple,” said the victorious Sculley. ”We talk about vision and what Steve contributed to vision, and it’s an immense contribution, no doubt about it”.
”Computers were big boring blue boxes until Steve Jobs came along,” he continued his measured praise. “And Apple will continue to be driven by the same vision of making computers for the individual in a youth-oriented company”
”But people tend to confuse vision with innovation. The real question is innovation, and most of the innovation, including the innovations in Macintosh, came from a lot of people.”
“Steve’s great contribution was recognizing that computers were tools for individuals and not large blue boxes for institutions. That doesn’t change, whether Steve is here or not.”
Fast forward 26 years to the Jobs’ successor as CEO, Tim Cook's statement about Steve leaving Apple:
“Apple is not going to change. I cherish and celebrate Apple’s unique principles and values. Steve built a company and culture that is unlike any other in the world and we are going to stay true to that – it is in our DNA. I am looking forward to the amazing opportunity of serving as CEO of the most innovative company in the world. Steve has been an incredible leader and mentor to me, as well as to the entire executive team and our amazing employees.”
Just as this time the press got very excited by Steve’s 1985 jump.
The Miami News quoted top people at Apple saying “We have put our individual egos aside and are putting teamwork in place.”
InfoWorld’s Kevin Strehlo believed “the shuffle could aid Apple”: “Apple is making the transition from one phase of its life to the next. I don’t know that the image of a leader clad in a bow tie, jeans, and suspenders would help us survive in the coming years.”
(It should be noted here that Kevin here is using the US definition of suspenders as trouser braces!)
Apple executive vice president William V. Campbell was quoted in The New York Times: ”We’ve been without Steve Jobs for the better part of four months. Since that time we’ve been doing just fine.”
But NYT writer Andrew Pollack urged caution in the post-Jobs celebrations: “Apple, while having a solid management, still might miss Mr Jobs. Some analysts and former employees are worried that Apple is losing its spark and becoming stodgy, a process some refer to as ‘Scullification’.
Pollack could be writing in 26 years later when he notes: “Product direction for the next six months to a year is already fairly well set. But problems could arise in a year or two, when the time comes to develop completely new products. Almost all analysts and company officials say that Jobs lent a certain creative spark and vision to Apple.”
Writing in Fortune magazine Bro Uttal quotes one of the Apple insiders shocked by Steve’s removal: ”They’ve cut the heart out of Apple and substituted an artificial one. We’ll just have to see how long it pumps.”
Uttal, too, is concerned for a Jobs-less Apple: “What Apple must do is hold together and carry out the latest product and marketing plans. To remain a strong contender in the long run, the company will also need the kinds of breakthrough products to which Jobs is devoted.
“If he does leave, the company will lose a champion of innovation, a foe of bureaucracy, and a priceless proselytizer to the rest of the world.”
Even more on the money was Washington Post writer T.R. Reid: “The directors of Apple have made an outrageous and potentially fatal blunder in taking their company away from the founding father then turning it over to a generic marketing man. The computer industry is littered with the corpses of promising companies that were managed into oblivion by marketing ‘experts’ who had no particular feel for silicon and software.
“The distinguishing thing about Steven Jobs is that he has a vision, a pervasive philosophy, about the role of personal computers in modern life. Over the long haul, Apple sans Steven Jobs is not going to be a pretty sight.”
It wasn’t, but Steve came back 12 years later to save Apple. That won’t happen this time round, but we hope Cook is right about the Jobs DNA being fully absorbed into the company he dreamed up, led, left, rescued and took to the very top of the technology tree.
(Thanks to Technologizer for sourcing the above media quotes of Steve’s original Apple exit.)
Click on these letters to continue the Apple A-Z.